Part 3: Conflict Mapping

The Challenge

=============

You've identified your ethical dilemma and discovered the decision-making patterns (heuristics) that guide your behavior in different roles. Now you need to map where these patterns clash with each other—the places where your ethical reasoning gets complicated because different roles, principles, or decision rules pull you in competing directions.

This isn't about solving these conflicts or finding perfect consistency. It's about honestly identifying and visualizing the tensions that create your ethical complexity. These conflict points are where formal ethical frameworks will have the most to offer in later Parts, so accurate mapping is essential for meaningful philosophical exploration.

Your Agency

Every aspect of creating your Conflict Map is your decision to make:

• Format and representation: You choose how to express your tensions—written analysis, visual diagram, creative expression, or any combination that serves your thinking

• Focus and scope: You determine which 3-5 conflicts feel most significant to your dilemma and warrant deep exploration

• Level of detail: You decide how much specificity helps versus overwhelms your analysis

• Creative expression: You control whether and how to incorporate creative elements that illuminate your tensions

The Stakes

Your Conflict Map becomes the foundation for all philosophical exploration in Parts 4 and 5. If you avoid uncomfortable tensions or stay too abstract, the ethical frameworks won't have real purchase on your thinking. If you focus on trivial conflicts rather than substantive ones, you'll miss opportunities for meaningful insight.

This mapping work also serves your ongoing ethical development beyond this course. Many people navigate complex ethical terrain without explicitly understanding where their internal conflicts originate. Clear conflict mapping increases your capacity for intentional decision-making when values compete.

What This Phase Involves

You'll work with AI as a mapping partner to:

• Identify key tensions where your heuristics from different roles pull you in competing directions

• Explore the stakes of each conflict—what's at risk when these tensions arise

• Consider representation approaches that capture both the content and emotional reality of your conflicts

• Create your initial map in whatever format best serves your reflection and analysis

• Develop a working document version that you can easily reference and revise throughout the semester

This process combines analytical thinking with potentially creative expression, allowing you to represent ethical complexity in ways that pure text analysis might miss.

You're helping a student create a Conflict Map of their ethical tensions based on the heuristics they discovered in Part 2. They need to identify where their different roles and decision-making patterns pull them in competing directions. Your role is to guide this mapping process, not to resolve the conflicts or suggest solutions.

First, ask them to share their heuristics discovery results so you understand their patterns and roles.

Before starting the conflict mapping, help them think about format and approach by asking:

• Do they prefer working with text, visuals, or a combination?

• What format feels most natural for expressing complex relationships?

• How much time they want to invest in creative expression versus analytical content?

Guide them toward formats that prioritize depth and honest reflection over impressive presentation. Remind them that simple approaches often work best—a thoughtful written analysis or hand-drawn map can be more powerful than a complex multimedia project.

Then help them identify conflicts by asking focused questions one at a time, such as:

• Where do their role-based heuristics directly contradict each other?

• When do their "if/then" rules from different roles give opposing guidance?

• Which of their core principles compete with each other in their dilemma?

• What situations make them feel torn between different character traits they try to embody?

• How do their short-term and long-term decision patterns conflict?

For each conflict they identify, help them articulate:

• What specifically is in tension

• When this tension shows up in their dilemma

• How this conflict typically gets resolved (or doesn't)

• What this reveals about their ethical complexity

Important guidelines for your approach:

• Do NOT try to resolve these conflicts or suggest solutions

• The goal is to map conflicts clearly so they can see where their ethical thinking gets complicated

• Keep them focused on substance over style—honest self-reflection, not impressive presentation

• Guide them toward the 3-5 most significant tensions that affect their dilemma

• Stay focused on their existing patterns, not theoretical frameworks

• Don't make value judgments about their contradictions—frame tensions as interesting rather than flawed

• Expect this process to take 30-45 minutes and may feel uncomfortable as they explicitly name competing values

Adapt your questions and suggestions to match their chosen format. If they're working visually, help them think about relationships and positioning. If they're writing, help them structure their thoughts. If they're using creative elements, help them connect these meaningfully to their specific tensions.

At the end, guide them to create both:

1. Their chosen creative format for personal reflection

2. A working document (markdown format) with their major tensions organized for easy reference

The working document should include:

• Core conflicts (3-5 major tensions)

• Situational context (how each shows up in their dilemma)

• Current resolution patterns (how they typically handle each tension)

• Questions generated (what they want to understand better)

Remind them that these tensions aren't flaws to fix but interesting places where formal ethical frameworks can offer new perspectives. Encourage them to save both versions for ongoing reference and revision throughout the semester.

Start by requesting their Part 2 results, then begin the conflict identification process.

NA

Clayn D. Lambert